How to Beat the French Defence: The Essential Guide to the Tarrasch
At pages, the book sounds long, but the larger type face allows the reader to move through the material quickly. Recent opening books like to focus on introductions and conclusions to chapters and I find that approach useful.
The Week in Chess
These elements are not included here and therefore the reader will have to study the meat of each chapter to determine where the crucial turning points are. This might be a minor complaint to some readers and in other ways the detailed move by move index in the back compensates for this shortcoming. There are numerous points for the theoretician to consider.
- Le ragioni dellinconscio (Italian Edition).
- Stories of Life in the Workplace: An Open Architecture for Organizational Narratology (Routledge Communication Series).
- Willem Dafoe zwischen Wooster Group und Hollywood. Der Wechsel von Performance zu Film (German Edition).
- Homemade pasta maker: Tricks & Tip , How to make pasta of handmade at home.
- Tiefe Spuren (German Edition).
- The Bachelorettes Bible - PART 4;
- Review: A classical guide to the French Defence | ChessBase?
Bd6 13 Bg5 O-O 14 Bd3! Just a few years ago 12 Qe2 was considered harmless and the move 14 Bd3! Overall, this book on the often less than exciting Tarrasch Variation revives interest and creates new opportunities for players of the white pieces. The strategic explanations alone are worth the price of the book and the analysis hits the mark for players of all levels.
- Comic Book Covers: Amazing Spider-Man #1-100 (The Complete Comic Book Covers)!
- Der schicksalhafte Kuss: Die Geschichte einer Traumatisierung (German Edition).
- Serpente Gigante: A Paul and Sarah Manhart Cryptozoological Adventure.
- A book on the Tarrasch in the French defense.
- Never Going Back Again (Adventures of Evan Book 1).
- How to Play the Game?:Successful as a woman in the masculine world of business! Learn the rules of men - and then make your own!.
- Tzermiadianos A. How to Beat the French Defence: The essential guide to the Tarrasch - StudMed.ру.
This book made me beat one of the best K Chess players in the country last week at Nationals in Minneapolis in less than 20 moves. It was one of the best chess books I've read. Tim Seltzer rated it really liked it Sep 29, Brian rated it really liked it Jan 19, Tapani rated it it was amazing May 07, Angela Maloney rated it liked it Jan 26, Cam Mcleman rated it liked it Jul 03, Brylle Genio added it Sep 22, Roxbury Driveyards marked it as to-read Aug 06, Andreas Kontokanis is currently reading it Aug 22, Stef added it Oct 07, Edelweiss Ntu marked it as to-read May 02, Ammor Hicham marked it as to-read Jun 27, Chaz22 marked it as to-read May 01, This is all fascinating stuff, and thanks to Tzermiadianos, a step and often more beyond the theory that existed before this book.
How to beat the french defence the essential guide to the tarrasch pdf - Google Документы
You can see by my analysis that the resulting positions can be argued over, and I'm sure that White could make his own case. This is a book that someone wishing to play 3 Nd2 absolutely has to have, and I think every French player will learn a great amount about his favourite opening by reading it. Within the genre of theoretical opening books, which by its nature includes many dry tomes, Viktor Moskalenko's The Flexible French is a great read.
The author sets himself he goal of presenting various favourite French variations with a broad perspective. Moskalenko talks about the history and ideas of the variation, along with some advice, statistics, and the occasional personal story. Ultimately, however, he is a keen analyst who spends most of his time as an openings book author should: The essence of the book lies with its choice of variations, many not well known to the average player. For example, he recommends The analysis is broad and enthusiastic, with an obvious preference for Black.
I should say, however, that he devotes quite as much time to the traditional Qb6 6 a3 6 Be2 Nh6 Nh6 , with which he has extensive playing experience, as well as I'll return to this multiple-line repertoire structure below. The book is not meant to be complete. It's closer to a repertoire from the Black side, although with omissions in each variation, for example, you won't see 4 Nf3 or 4 Qg4 in the Advance Variation.
Or, in his coverage of the Winawer 3 Nc3 Bb4 , White has some rather important variations with which to challenge Black such as 4 Bd2 , 4 a3 , and even 4 exd5. These aren't mentioned, and after 4 e5 c5 , we see 5 Bd2 but not 5 Qg4 , 5 dxc5 , 5 Nf3 and so forth. From White's point of view, although Moskalenko occasionally presents some fun and intriguing moves, there's only bits and pieces of a whole repertoire. Of course, there is not meant to be one; the book is primarily from Black's perspective. Bb4 MacCutcheon chapter makes for great reading.
Ba5 6 bxc3 Ne7 isn't part of Moskalenko's Black repertoire, so naturally we don't see it from White's point of view. That's simply not the kind of book we have here. Moskalenko has played a hodgepodge of Black systems in the main lines, and wants to talk about all of them! That means that you get multiple weapons against many systems.
In the Winawer alone, for example, he has whole chapters on 3 Nc3 Bb4 4 e5 b6!? And just to top it off, you can skip Bb4 entirely and play the Classical with Nf6 with a repertoire of limited flexibility by comparison with Again, there's some slightly out-of-place but very good coverage of the Black side of the Alekhine-Chatard attack 6 h4 , but since that comes from 3 Nc3 Nf3 4 Bg5 Be7 5 e5 Nfd7 , he should probably have said something about the main line 6 Bxe7!
Or, in the Tarrasch with 3 Nd2 , he has chapters on Be7 with fantastic ideas , Nf6 , suddenly with complete analysis of all the important sidelines! Throughout, the play is lively and the analysis simply sparkles with ideas. Then there are strange pauses. For a full 19 pages, he treats the lesser-known system which he calls 'Russian Roulette': From White's point of view! That is characteristic of the whole book: It's more like a tour, or a series of articles, than a systematic presentation. Because of its selectivity, it won't provide solutions to some of the variations that might bother you, but that only means that a French Defence player will want to use it in conjunction with other sources.
It's hard to say too much more without going into the history of lines or analytical niceties, but I very much approve of this book. Moskalenko is a leading French expert and it shows throughout; there's hardly a variation in the book to which he hasn't either contributed something or in which he hasn't noticed some still-unfashionable line that some strong analysts have revived. In fact, the book serves as a tribute to the French Defence itself.
The French has another mission entirely: That is an almost impossible task, but they do a yeoman's job of it. As with other Chess Explained books, the featured games are all contemporary, that is, played in and thereafter, with one exception a game by Eingorn himself in Likewise, the theory in the notes derives from recent contests, which to some extent allows them to bypass older lines that are at least temporarily out of favour. Inevitably, the material is winnowed down, for example, the content begins with 1 e4 e6 2 d4 d5 , and not 1 e4 e6 , which is understandable; the reader will have to research things like the King's Indian Attack and Moskalenko's 2 Nf3 d5 3 Nc3 variation mentioned above.
Nevertheless, the authors do a good job of hitting not only high points, but the kind of supporting lines that Moskalenko doesn't cover.
For example, the Winawer coverage is exceptionally good, and we get games with 4 exd5 and 4 Nge2 , with notes on 4 Qg4 , 4 Bd3 , 4 Qd3 , 4 Bd2 , and 4 a3 , the latter two of particular importance. At move 5, after 4 e5 c5 , the coverage is less impressive regarding White's 'minor' but important moves. The popular 5 Bd2 and dynamic 5 dxc5 in particular deserve more than a few unexplained moves.
See a Problem?
But if they'd covered everything, you would end up with little more than a skeleton and not much that 'explains' the French. They include Winawers with 7 Qg4 Kf8!? The less common but important Ba5 has a terribly instructive game as an exemplar. We already saw in his Creative Chess Opening Preparation that Eingorn loves slightly out-of-the-way French Tarrasch lines such as 3 Nd2 h6 and 3 Nd2 a6 both in my Dangerous Weapons book , which the authors also devote more than the expected space to. Be7 is given its due, while some long old main lines stemming from Nf6 are too dense and the authors simply have to give them relatively superficial treatment.
How To Beat The French Defence
The Advance Variation 3 e5 receives only 14 pages note that pages in the 'Chess Explained' series contain more material than the average book of their dimension. That really is a problem, as the authors dismiss all options on moves 3 and 4 other than Qb6 are given attention rather than those with Traditional main lines such as The problem is that the French Defence is a much broader and theoretically more complex opening than some others in the Chess Explained series, so the cuts need be more Draconian.
Everyman had the same problem with its own Starting Out: I should mention Bogdanov, the lesser-known co-author. He is not only the long-time second for Eingorn, but a trainer of Moskalenko and Drozdovsky, names very familiar to French Defence enthusiasts, and Savchenko, who plays the French relatively often. That more than qualifies him as a French Defence expert. One of the main reasons to recommend this book is that the authors clearly know their subject and, as you would expect from Eingorn, have an eye for the slightly unusual moves that might improve upon the main games and keep the variations alive for both sides.
They also have a healthy respect for White's strengths in the French, and show them in detail. Neil McDonald is not only a leading French Defence expert, he is also one of the premier writers about it. In How to Play Against 1 e4 , he recommends an anti-1 e4 repertoire with the French.
First, a relevant digression. In , McDonald wrote Starting Out: I found this a very brave book for recommending that White go into nearly every Open Sicilian variation that is, with 2 Nf3 and 3 d4. No one does this in a repertoire book, much less given a couple hundred pages to cover all of 1 e4! Every author would tell you that the Open Sicilian variations are too complex and space-consuming etc. Anyway, versus the French the Starting Out: Nf6 4 e5 Nfd7 5 Bd3 c5 6 c3 Nc6 and via Only versus the Guimard, he does recommend the Tzermiadianos' solution above, but without considering So, to return to the book at hand, i.
For example, versus the Advance Variation, he gives the little-investigated option Bd7-b5, in both cases to swap his bad bishop for White's good one.
Related products:
Bc6, called 'the Fort Knox'. One of the other reasons that I'm talking about How to Play Against 1 e4 , is to bring you attention to McDonald's Chesspublishing column on the French Defence, which is, bar none, the best source on completely up-to-date and well annotated information on the French Defence. Theoreticians, almost all of them GMs, take the latest month's batch of games and annotate what they see as the most interesting ones. It's definitely worth exploring.
I have a column on the site. ChessPublishing can be the best way to find out how a line is evolving. McDonald's repertoire includes the line: Be7 is a later discovery that has gotten a better and better reputation. Today, most attention is being concentrated upon the line 9. This move was played in Sadvakasov-Hernandez Guerrero, Merida in December of last year, and thus was unavailable to McDonald for the book his main game goes 12 dxc5?! Bg1 cxd4 and leading to equality. But on ChessPublishing post-book , he gives the only serious analysis that I've seen of this game, criticizing Hernandez Guerrero's Bb7 and preferring I still like White by a bit, but that's another matter.
As the game went, Black was slightly worse, but got a good game after White tried for too much. Let me move on to brief comments on some other books. In column 91 I talked about Christoph Wisnewski's Play A complete chess opening repertoire for Black. That was in the context of his Chigorin recommendation 1 d4 d5 2 c4 Nc6. He also wants Black to play 1 e4 Nc6 2 d4 d5 3 Nc3 e6 , which is the same as the French line 1 e4 e6 2 d4 d5 3 Nc3 Nc6.