Uncategorized

Indiscriminate Distinctions

The "set of items or objects" would be the data gathered for the article. This definition, because of the word "associated", implies some kind of "discriminate" grouping is required for a collection. However, if this were meant to be used in the policy then the word "indiscriminate" would be redundant as all collections would be considered "discriminate" at least on some level. There may be some meaning in this definition in this essay because the act of "collecting" information for articles may imply that the indiscriminate collection of data applies across all of Wikipedia and not just to one article.

Where one article may appear to be an "indiscriminate list" that article may be associated with other articles such that when viewed as a whole can actually represent a very discriminate topic. Since the policy specifically states "indiscriminate" and does not provide any guidelines for disallowing a certain level "discriminate" collection of information, then a discriminate collection of information would not violate the policy as stated in WP: Of course, this does not mean that any given collection or article would be immune from other policies. Just because a collection is discriminate does not mean it does not violate policies such as verifiability , neutral point of view , etc.

Clearing the "discriminate collection" test is merely one part of many requirements to a successful article. For example, the above list of the "Brady Bunch" characters certainly is a discriminate list of information--but that does not mean that it is a good article for Wikipedia.

Translation

Additional notability and information would need to be brought together and have to create the article The Brady Bunch. Wikipedians have also created a list of the Brady Bunch characters. These articles are examples of how the "discriminate list" test can be used as a base of a quality entry into Wikipedia.

So, collections of information brought together with a reasonable amount of thought, care, and distinctions would certainly not violate policy. Enthusiastic editors are encouraged to put thought and care into collecting information for meaningful articles. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This page is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines , as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community.


  • Join Kobo & start eReading today.
  • The Little Fisher (Little Nipper Storytelling Series Book 1)?
  • Indiscriminate Distinctions.
  • Four-Star Leadership for Leaders - Volume II. Interviews With Distinguished Generals & Admirals;

Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. I'm curious on your take on it. The data still has to be discriminate and encyclopedic. If "indiscriminate" truly means "Without care or making distinctions, thoughtless" then the article in question certainly is not "indiscriminate" because the information is specifically focused on a topic, and the antonym seems to support that. Which brings me right back to the original quesiton--how do we know?

Etymologies

I'm actually ending up with more questions than before, but I'll sit and stew on them for a while Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information Trivia sections. But for Napoleon, it was Tuesday Coatrack articles Discriminate vs indiscriminate information Example cruft Handling trivia Insignificant In popular culture Listcruft Relevance of content.


  • indiscriminate - Dictionary Definition : www.newyorkethnicfood.com.
  • Wikipedia:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information.
  • 25 Simple Steps To Be A Liberal;
  • The Picture of Dorian Gray Level 3 Oxford Bookworms Library: 1000 Headwords.
  • Rules of Combat - The Development of Warrior Tactics.

Popular Culture Trivia Cleanup Laundromat. Value of essays Difference between policies, guidelines and essays Don't cite essays as if they were policy Avoid writing redundant essays Finding an essay Quote your own essay. Essays on building, editing, and deleting content. Articles must be written Avoid vague introductions Be a reliable source Cohesion Concede lost arguments Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia Don't lie Explanationism External criticism of Wikipedia Here to build an encyclopedia Most ideas are bad Need Neutrality of sources Not editing because of Wikipedia restriction Oversimplification Paradoxes Paraphrasing POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields Product, process, policy Purpose Systemic bias There is no seniority Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia Tendentious editing The role of policies in collaborative anarchy The rules are principles Trifecta Wikipedia in brief Wikipedia is an encyclopedia Wikipedia is a community.

Adjectives in your recommendations AfD is not a war zone Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions Arguments to make in deletion discussions Avoid repeated arguments Before commenting in a deletion discussion But there must be sources! Confusing arguments mean nothing Content removal Counting and sorting are not original research Delete the junk Does deletion help?

indiscriminate - Wiktionary

What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork No Encyclopedic Use. How to be civil Maintaining a friendly space Negotiation Accepting other users Enjoy yourself Expect no thanks Thank you Apology Truce Divisiveness Encouraging the newcomers Relationships with academic editors High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors Obsessive Compulsive Disorder editors.

Scores of civilians have also been killed in indiscriminate suicide attacks launched by Taleban insurgents, as well as in attacks using improvised explosive devices IEDs such as roadside bombs. Log in or sign up to add your own related words.

Buy for others

Log in or sign up to get involved in the conversation. It's quick and easy. Community Word of the day Random word Log in or Sign up. Not making or based on careful distinctions; unselective: Unrestrained or wanton; profligate: Without care or making distinctions, thoughtless. Not discriminate; wanting discrimination; undistinguishing; not making any distinction; confused; promiscuous.

Etymologies Sorry, no etymologies found. Examples He also condemned what he called the indiscriminate firing of projectiles towards Israeli civilian areas by Palestinian militants. Middle East Talks Deadlocked Separately, Russia called on the international community to stop what it called the " indiscriminate " use of force in Libya, saying it was killing civilians.

Lecture 10. Biblical Law: The Three Legal Corpora of JE (Exodus), P (Leviticus and Numbers) and D

Obama Backs Governors' Pleas for Aid to States Church, but he does not believe in what he calls indiscriminate charity. The Silent Isle Mrs. A Novel On the outside looking in, China, Russia and India remain highly critical of what they call indiscriminate '' coalition bombing of civilians. Top News Stories He was previously in Moscow, where President Dmitry Medvedev criticised what he called the " indiscriminate use of force" by coalition aircraft in Libya.